Suckle v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
165 So. 2d 481, 246 La. 582, 1964 La. LEXIS 2606
Opinion
In re: Louis Suckle, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Cad-do. 163 So.2d 564.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suckle v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 165 So. 2d 481, 246 La. 582, 1964 La. LEXIS 2606 (La. 1964).
165 So. 2d 481 (Suckle v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aetna Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
340 So. 2d 345 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1976)
Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
324 So. 2d 571 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1976)
Richardson v. Tate
269 So. 2d 278 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)