Stuber v. Coler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stuber v. Coler

64 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.Y.S. 1149 (Stuber v. Coler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stuber v. Coler, 64 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. The question may be certified as follows: Upon the facts disclosed by the record in the present case, was the appointment of Julius Weiman, made on the 2Sth day of December, 1899, to be clerk of the municipal court of the city of New York for the Third district in the borough of Brooklyn, a valid and effective appointment for a term of six years? See 63 N. Y. Supp. 723.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. The question may be certified as follows: Upon the facts disclosed by the record in the present case, was the appointment of Julius Weiman, made on the 2Sth day of December, 1899, to be clerk of the municipal court of the city of New York for the Third district in the borough of Brooklyn, a valid and effective appointment for a term of six years? See 63 N. Y. Supp. 723.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuber-v-coler-nyappdiv-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack