Stuber v. Coler
64 N.Y.S. 1149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stuber v. Coler. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 A.D. 88 →
Opinion
Application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. The question may be certified as follows: Upon the facts disclosed by the record in the present case, was the appointment of Julius Weiman, made on the 2Sth day of December, 1899, to be clerk of the municipal court of the city of New York for the Third district in the borough of Brooklyn, a valid and effective appointment for a term of six years? See 63 N. Y. Supp. 723.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stuber v. Coler, 64 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
64 N.Y.S. 1149 (Stuber v. Coler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stuber v. Coler
49 A.D. 88 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)