Stoller v. Jaffe

125 So. 2d 310
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 22, 1960
Docket59-682
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 125 So. 2d 310 (Stoller v. Jaffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoller v. Jaffe, 125 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

125 So.2d 310 (1960)

Leon L. STOLLER, Appellant,
v.
Ben JAFFE and Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Company of Hammond, Appellees.

No. 59-682.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

September 22, 1960.
Rehearing Denied January 10, 1961.

Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.

Ward & Ward, Miami, for appellees.

HORTON, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a final decree entered after trial dismissing a complaint brought by the appellant, plaintiff below, seeking to recover compensation for certain alleged services rendered the appellee. The complaint consisted of two counts. The first was based upon an oral agreement entered into between the parties which allegedly constituted a joint venture. The second sought recovery upon a quantum meruit claim. Following a hearing of the issues, the chancellor found that the plaintiff had failed to carry the burden of proof that he had any agreement or contract, either express or implied, with the defendants, and further, that he had failed to carry or sustain the burden of proof with reference to any express oral contract or a contract by implication that there was any joint venture agreement between the parties. The chancellor concluded that the plaintiff wholly failed to sustain the burden of proof in connection with his quantum meruit claim.

The basic contention raised upon appeal is the claimed insufficiency of the *311 evidence to support the chancellor's findings. We have reviewed the record and find that although the testimony is conflicting there is substantial evidence to support the chancellor's findings and accordingly, these findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the chancellor committed error or that the evidence demonstrates his conclusions to be erroneous. Tyler v. Tyler, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So.2d 312; Pergament v. Pergament, Fla.App. 1959, 117 So.2d 26. See In re Lohbiller's Estate, Fla.App. 1959, 113 So.2d 248.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., J., and ODOM, ARCHIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Butler
297 So. 2d 103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
State Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Ball
300 So. 2d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Griffith Services, Inc. v. Walter Kidde Constuctors, Inc.
262 So. 2d 240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.
255 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Zutell v. Sunrise Oldsmobile, Inc.
252 So. 2d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Johnson v. Gaines
249 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Tuten v. Black
247 So. 2d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
McNair ex rel. McNair v. Continental Insurance Co.
245 So. 2d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Mitchell v. Burgess & Cook, Inc.
238 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Garrett v. Garrett
239 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Walters v. Long
237 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Murdock v. Luttrall
232 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
In re Estate of Nelson
232 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Huxford v. Huxford
231 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Staton v. Staton
231 So. 2d 531 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Dowda v. Dowda
225 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Hart v. Hart
225 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Mogee v. Haller
222 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Silver v. Wilson
221 So. 2d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Barlow v. McDonald
221 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 2d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoller-v-jaffe-fladistctapp-1960.