Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.

255 So. 2d 713, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1971

DocketNos. P-80, P-81

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 So. 2d 713 (Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co., 255 So. 2d 713, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the adverse final judgments rendered in favor of appel-lees in each of the above-entitled causes. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgments here challenged.

In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting in some material respects, it contains substantial evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.¹

[714]*714The judgments appealed are respectively affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the adverse final judgments rendered in favor of appel-lees in each of the above-entitled causes. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgments here challenged.

In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting in some material respects, it contains substantial evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.¹

[714]*714The judgments appealed are respectively affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 2d 713, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-parks-inc-v-poole-engineering-co-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack