Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.

255 So. 2d 713, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1971·No. Nos. P-80, P-81·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the adverse final judgments rendered in favor of appel-lees in each of the above-entitled causes. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgments here challenged.

In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting in some material respects, it contains substantial evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.1

[714] The judgments appealed are respectively affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co., 255 So. 2d 713, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

255 So. 2d 713 (Davis Parks, Inc. v. Poole Engineering Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler Plaza, Inc. v. ALLEN TROVILLION
389 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)