Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Butler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Butler

297 So. 2d 103, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6800

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 1974

DocketNos. U-179 to U-182

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 297 So. 2d 103 (Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Butler, 297 So. 2d 103, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appel-lee. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

In our review of the record we have given due consideration to the applicable appellate principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Our review of the record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict and judgment thereon. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.¹ The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appel-lee. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

In our review of the record we have given due consideration to the applicable appellate principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Our review of the record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict and judgment thereon. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.¹ The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 So. 2d 103, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-pulp-paper-corp-v-butler-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack