Stokes v. State
884 So. 2d 240, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680, 2004 WL 1752181
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10877 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Dixon v. State, 812 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 831 So.2d 671 (Fla.2002). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 884 So. 2d 240, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680, 2004 WL 1752181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 240 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Wright v. State
834 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
O'NEAL v. State
862 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)