Stokes v. State
871 So. 2d 1068, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599, 2004 WL 1057695
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10877 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla.2002)(“A ruling on a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court and should be ‘granted only when it is necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.’ Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427 (Fla.2001).”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1203, 123 S.Ct. 1275, 154 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 871 So. 2d 1068, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599, 2004 WL 1057695 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
871 So. 2d 1068 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shelton v. Palmateer, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility
537 U.S. 1203 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Smithers v. State
826 So. 2d 916 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Gore v. State
784 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)