Stokes v. State
871 So. 2d 1068, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599, 2004 WL 1057695
This text of 871 So. 2d 1068 (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stokes v. State, 871 So. 2d 1068, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599, 2004 WL 1057695 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla.2002)(“A ruling on a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court and should be ‘granted only when it is necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.’ Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427 (Fla.2001).”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1203, 123 S.Ct. 1275, 154 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shelton v. Palmateer, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility
537 U.S. 1203 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Smithers v. State
826 So. 2d 916 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Gore v. State
784 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
871 So. 2d 1068, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599, 2004 WL 1057695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.