Stokes v. State

776 So. 2d 1039, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 2001 WL 85180
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2001·No. No. 1D99-4403·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is AFFIRMED because the argument raised on appeal was not presented below, and was therefore not preserved. See Johnson v. State, 717 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 761 So.2d 318 (Fla.2000); Perry v. State, 714 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stokes v. State, 776 So. 2d 1039, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 2001 WL 85180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 1039 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. State
714 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Johnson v. State
717 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)