Stokes v. State

776 So. 2d 1039, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 2001 WL 85180
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2001
DocketNo. 1D99-4403
StatusPublished

This text of 776 So. 2d 1039 (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stokes v. State, 776 So. 2d 1039, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 2001 WL 85180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is AFFIRMED because the argument raised on appeal was not presented below, and was therefore not preserved. See Johnson v. State, 717 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 761 So.2d 318 (Fla.2000); Perry v. State, 714 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. State
714 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Johnson v. State
717 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 1039, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 2001 WL 85180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.