Stokes v. State
764 So. 2d 755, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8479, 2000 WL 898025
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 756 So. 2d 1100 →
Opinion
The appellant challenges sentences imposed against him pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines. The offenses occurred in June of 1996 and January of 1997. Because the 1995 sentencing guidelines are unconstitutional, we remand this case to the trial court to reconsider this sentence. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 764 So. 2d 755, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8479, 2000 WL 898025 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
764 So. 2d 755 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)