Stokes v. State
581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6736, 1991 WL 116985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 604 So. 2d 836 →
Opinion
The only issue warranting discussion is the trial court’s failure to enter written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse in accordance with Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990) and Savory v. State, 576 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court may not depart from the sentencing guideline sentence. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6736, 1991 WL 116985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
581 So. 2d 651 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Savory v. State
576 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)