Stokes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stokes v. State

581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6736, 1991 WL 116985

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1991

DocketNo. 89-2589

StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 651 (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stokes v. State, 581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6736, 1991 WL 116985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue warranting discussion is the trial court’s failure to enter written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse in accordance with Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990) and Savory v. State, 576 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court may not depart from the sentencing guideline sentence. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only issue warranting discussion is the trial court’s failure to enter written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse in accordance with Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990) and Savory v. State, 576 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court may not depart from the sentencing guideline sentence. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6736, 1991 WL 116985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack