Stokes v. State
533 So. 2d 330, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2491, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4986, 1988 WL 120700
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2221 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion. With respect to that portion of appellant’s motion wherein he purports to attack the effectiveness of his appellate counsel, we would point out that the proper method of raising such issue is via a habeas corpus petition filed [331]*331directly with the appellate court. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stokes v. State, 533 So. 2d 330, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2491, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4986, 1988 WL 120700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
533 So. 2d 330 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knight v. State
394 So. 2d 997 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)