Stokes v. State

527 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 451, 1988 WL 8110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2329
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1988·No. No. 86-2098·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s confession of error, the sentence of the defendant is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions that the trial court resentence the defendant to a term of years no greater than that permitted by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14). The trial court's basis for an upward departure from the guidelines was its conclusion that the defendant committed the crimes for which he was charged and acquitted. Such a basis, as the State has candidly conceded, is erroneous. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 2d [217]*217DCA 1986); Mora v. State, 484 So.2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stokes v. State, 527 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 451, 1988 WL 8110 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

527 So. 2d 216 (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mora v. State
484 So. 2d 621 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Tyner v. State
491 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)