Savory v. State

576 So. 2d 339, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 1991 WL 15463
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1991·No. No. 89-2408·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue warranting discussion is the trial court’s failure to enter written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

HERSEY, C.J., LETTS, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savory v. State, 576 So. 2d 339, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 1991 WL 15463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 339 (Savory v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokes v. State
581 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)