Stokes v. MILLEN ROOFING CO.
This text of 626 N.W.2d 925 (Stokes v. MILLEN ROOFING CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert STOKES and Patricia Stokes, Plaintiff-Appellant/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
MILLEN ROOFING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, and
Douglas Sumner, Comerica Bank, Thomas Dowling and George Schuler, Third-Party Defendants.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
ORDER
Stokes v. Millen Roofing Co., 245 Mich. App. 44, 627 N.W.2d 16. The March 9, *926 2001, opinion in this matter has been reviewed pursuant to MCR 7.215(I). A majority of the judges polled have determined that a special panel should not be convened to resolve any potential conflict with Republic Bank v. Modular One LLC, 232 Mich.App. 444, 591 N.W.2d 335 (1998).
Therefore, a special panel will not convene.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 N.W.2d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-millen-roofing-co-michctapp-2001.