Stewart v. State
866 So. 2d 128, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1331, 2004 WL 384356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 438 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction of exploitation of elderly person, but reverse his conviction of grand theft because the crimes involved one act of taking the same property and therefore violated double jeopardy. Thomason v. State, 790 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. State, 866 So. 2d 128, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1331, 2004 WL 384356 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 128 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomason v. State
790 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)