Stewart v. State

856 So. 2d 1092, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15654, 2003 WL 22358098
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 438
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2380·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Charleston v. State, 852 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Gibson v. State, 721 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Correia v. State, 695 So.2d 461, 463 (Fla. [1093]*10934th DCA 1997); Robinson v. State, 575 So.2d 699, 703 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

BARFIELD, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 856 So. 2d 1092, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15654, 2003 WL 22358098 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

856 So. 2d 1092 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Correia v. State
695 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Gibson v. State
721 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Charleston v. State
852 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Robinson v. State
575 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)