Stewart v. State

866 So. 2d 128, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1331, 2004 WL 384356
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-1122
StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 128 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 866 So. 2d 128, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1331, 2004 WL 384356 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of exploitation of elderly person, but reverse his conviction of grand theft because the crimes involved one act of taking the same property and therefore violated double jeopardy. Thomason v. State, 790 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomason v. State
790 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 128, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1331, 2004 WL 384356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.