Stewart v. Medina

S.D. New York

Stewart v. Medina

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 20, 2024·No. 7:23-cv-00880·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn KX GARY A. STEWART, Plaintiff, 23 CIVIL 0880 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT G. MEDINA, Defendant.. wn

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 20, 2024, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. Accordingly, the case is closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). DATED: New York, New York June 20, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY: TR Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn KX GARY A. STEWART, Plaintiff, 23 CIVIL 0880 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT G. MEDINA, Defendant.. wn

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 20, 2024, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. Accordingly, the case is closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). DATED: New York, New York June 20, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY: TR Deputy Clerk

Stewart v. Medina, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Pincite

Stewart v. Medina (Stewart v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related