Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp.
This text of 262 A.D. 872 (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference in the trial of a tort action reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, and the case set down for trial five days after the entry of the order hereon. It is the established rule that where a person is on relief and, therefore, a public charge, such person is entitled to a preference in the trial of a tort action on the ground of destitution. (Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp., 257 App. Div. 857, and cases cited therein.) The denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 872, 28 N.Y.S.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-bridge-auto-renting-corp-nyappdiv-1941.