Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp.

262 A.D. 872, 28 N.Y.S.2d 326
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 872 (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp., 262 A.D. 872, 28 N.Y.S.2d 326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference in the trial of a tort action reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, and the case set down for trial five days after the entry of the order hereon. It is the established rule that where a person is on relief and, therefore, a public charge, such person is entitled to a preference in the trial of a tort action on the ground of destitution. (Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp., 257 App. Div. 857, and cases cited therein.) The denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beltran v. Borstein
32 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Brown v. Upfold
204 Misc. 416 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Rogers v. Derris
281 A.D. 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.
277 A.D.2d 1140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Healy v. Healy
198 Misc. 688 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 872, 28 N.Y.S.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-bridge-auto-renting-corp-nyappdiv-1941.