Rogers v. Derris
This text of 281 A.D. 697 (Rogers v. Derris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision, plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a preference in the trial of the action. Her moving papers establish that she is on the relief rolls of the City of New York, which fact is not controverted by respondents. Order reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. In our opinion the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp., 262 App. Div. 872; Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp., 257 App. Div. 857.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 697, 117 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-derris-nyappdiv-1952.