Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.

277 A.D.2d 1140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1140 (Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp., 277 A.D.2d 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference in trial reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted,, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed, the denial of the preference was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Benting Gorp., 262 App. Div. 872.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference in trial reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted,, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed, the denial of the preference was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Benting Gorp., 262 App. Div. 872.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-gelat-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack