Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.
277 A.D.2d 1140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1950·Published
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference in trial reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted,, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed, the denial of the preference was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Stevens v. Bridge Auto Benting Gorp., 262 App. Div. 872.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp., 277 A.D.2d 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).
277 A.D.2d 1140 (Brown v. Gelat Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp.
262 A.D. 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)