Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine

Federal Circuit

Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine

103 F.3d 1517

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 2, 1997

Docket95-1266, 95-1302, 95-1314

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 103 F.3d 1517 (Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine, 103 F.3d 1517 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the APPELLEE, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to and acted upon by the panel that heard the appeal, and, thereafter, the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the judges authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc, and a poll having been requested, taken, and failed, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, and it is further

[1518]*1518ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge NEWMAN, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge PLAGER, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge MICHEL dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge RADER dissents in a separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the APPELLEE, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to and acted upon by the panel that heard the appeal, and, thereafter, the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the judges authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc, and a poll having been requested, taken, and failed, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, and it is further

[1518]*1518ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge NEWMAN, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge PLAGER, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge MICHEL dissents in a separate opinion. Circuit Judge RADER dissents in a separate opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F.3d 1517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-g-lough-v-brunswick-corporation-dba-mercury-marine-cafc-1997.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack