Stephansen v. County of Westchester
This text of 257 A.D. 1050 (Stephansen v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services, defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the [1051]*1051ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to a review of the order in question on an appeal from whatever judgment may be entered on the termination of the trial. The order appealed from was made upon a ruling on the trial and, therefore, is not appealable. (Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 77 App. Div. 407; Stevens v. Naumburg, 214 id. 94; Jackman v. Hasbrouck, 168 id. 256; Water Right & Electrical Co. Inc., v. Rockland Light & Power Co., 245 id. 739.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 1050, 13 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephansen-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1939.