Kandell v. American Beverage Corp.
This text of 263 A.D. 888 (Kandell v. American Beverage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On plaintiff’s appeal, order setting aside verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. Defendant’s cross-appeal from order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint dismissed, without costs. Defendant, a manufacturer of beverages, entered into a contract with plaintiff as a distributor. On plaintiff’s own testimony and that of defendant’s sales manager, which was uneontradieted, plaintiff breached a material term of the contract by selling goods delivered to him for free distribution for advertising and sales promotion purposes, and retaining the proceeds of such sales. Apart from the question whether or not plaintiff voluntarily abandoned the contract, this breach by plaintiff was sufficient to warrant his discharge. (Getty v. Williams Silver Co., 221 N. Y. 34.) In no event, therefore, could plaintiff recover. The motion to dismiss the. complaint should have been granted. On this record, however, we can do nothing but affirm the order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial, and dismiss the appeal from the other order, which was made upon a ruling upon the trial and is not appealable. (Stephansen v. County of Westchester, 257 App. Div. 1050.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 888, 32 N.Y.S.2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kandell-v-american-beverage-corp-nyappdiv-1942.