Steel v. State

5 S.W.2d 517, 109 Tex. Crim. 480, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 1928·No. No. 11711.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder, penalty fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of eight years.

The record is void of bills of exceptions. Among the papers is found a document denominated a statement of facts. It bears no certificate showing the approval of the trial judge. To warrant the consideration of the statement of facts, the approval of the trial judge is imperative. See Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., 1925, Vol. 3, Art. 760, p. 103, note 24; also Barnes v. State, 102 Tex. Crim. Rep. 155; Boles v. State, 102 Tex. Crim. Rep. 634.

Perceiving no error in the record presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steel v. State, 5 S.W.2d 517, 109 Tex. Crim. 480, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316 (Tex. 1928).

5 S.W.2d 517 (Steel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayes v. State
202 S.W.2d 942 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Howard Brewer v. State
97 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Vicera v. State
27 S.W.2d 545 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Smith v. State
22 S.W.2d 460 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)