Boles v. State

279 S.W. 261, 102 Tex. Crim. 634, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1230
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 24, 1925
DocketNo. 8847.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 279 S.W. 261 (Boles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boles v. State, 279 S.W. 261, 102 Tex. Crim. 634, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1230 (Tex. 1925).

Opinions

BAKER, Judge.

The appellants were tried and convicted in the District Court of Shelby County of manslaughter and Calvin Boles’ punishment was assessed at five years in the penitentiary and Claud Boles’ punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

We find a motion of the state in this* cáse to strike out the statement of facts, alleging that no duplicate of same was ever filed in the district clerk’s office as required by law. It becomes unnecessary for us to pass on this motion at this time for the reason that upon an inspection of what purports to be a statement of facts filed in this court by the appellant, we find that same is not signed by the trial judge who tried the case, and of course, under such circumstances, we are unauthorized to consider said statement of facts in any particular.

The record discloses proper indictment, charge of the court, verdict of the jury, judgment and sentence of the appellants and no fundamental errors appearing therein, we are forced to the conclusion that this case must be affirmed. Of course, we observe many questions raised by appellants to the action of the trial court but without a statement of facts, we could not determine whether same constitute any error or not.

For the reasons above stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goode v. State
740 S.W.2d 453 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Pogue v. State
553 S.W.2d 368 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Batten v. State
533 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Lucas v. State
216 S.W.2d 820 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Hall v. State
40 S.W.2d 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Steel v. State
5 S.W.2d 517 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 S.W. 261, 102 Tex. Crim. 634, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boles-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.