Howard Brewer v. State

97 S.W.2d 231, 131 Tex. Crim. 211, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 497
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 1936·No. No. 18267.·Published

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years,

We find in the record a document denominated a “statement *212 of facts.” It bears no certificate showing the approval of the trial judge. To warrant the consideration of the statement of facts, the approval of the trial judge is imperative. Steel v. State, 5 S. W. (2d) 517.

In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard Brewer v. State, 97 S.W.2d 231, 131 Tex. Crim. 211, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 497 (Tex. 1936).

97 S.W.2d 231 (Howard Brewer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steel v. State
5 S.W.2d 517 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)