Howard Brewer v. State
This text of 97 S.W.2d 231 (Howard Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years,
We find in the record a document denominated a “statement *212 of facts.” It bears no certificate showing the approval of the trial judge. To warrant the consideration of the statement of facts, the approval of the trial judge is imperative. Steel v. State, 5 S. W. (2d) 517.
In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills of exception.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.W.2d 231, 131 Tex. Crim. 211, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-brewer-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.