Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

90 So. 871, 206 Ala. 488, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 224

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 20, 1921

Docket6 Div. 259.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 So. 871 (Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 90 So. 871, 206 Ala. 488, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 224 (Ala. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

[1] A primary question presented is: Can a party to a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 206 et seq.) appeal from a judgment rendered by the circuit court, or is the sole revisory remedy by certiorari?

[2] The rulings sought to be presented in this court for review by appeal, rather than by certiorari, will not be considered, on the authority of Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 90 South. 803. 2 A question of jurisdiction being presented, and which may not ho waived by consent, the appeal will he dismissed ex mero motu.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ„ concur.

2

Ante, p. 447.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI