Smith v. Wilson

28 So. 2d 182, 248 Ala. 436
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 5, 1946
Docket4 Div. 426.
StatusPublished

This text of 28 So. 2d 182 (Smith v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Wilson, 28 So. 2d 182, 248 Ala. 436 (Ala. 1946).

Opinion

STAKELY Justice.

The record shows that the proceedings in this case were brought under and pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Section 253 et seq., Title 26, Code of 1940. Accordingly the proceedings and judgment are governed by the law applicable to such cases. It is sought to review the judgment and rulings of the lower court by appeal. This court has held, however, that the remedy is only by certiorari. The appeal must be dismissed. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 206 Ala. 488, 90 So. 871; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803; Carothers v. McNabb, 216 Ala. 366, 113 So. 298; Hallmark v. Virginia Bridge Corp., 241 Ala. 283, 2 So.2d 447.

Appeal dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hallmark v. Virginia Bridge Co.
2 So. 2d 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford
90 So. 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Carothers v. McNabb
113 So. 298 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
90 So. 871 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 So. 2d 182, 248 Ala. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wilson-ala-1946.