Carothers v. McNabb

113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1927·No. 6 Div. 863.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The complaint in this case clearly appears upon its face to he filed under the Workmen’s Compensation -Act (Acts 1919, p. 206), and the proceedings and judgment are governed by the rules of law and practice applicable to such cases.

The judgment of the trial court can be reviewed here only by a writ of certiorari. The remedy by appeal, to which defendant has here resorted, is not available, and the appeal will be dismissed. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 206 Ala. 488, 90 So. 871; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carothers v. McNabb, 113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170 (Ala. 1927).

113 So. 298 (Carothers v. McNabb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faddis v. Woodward Iron Company
161 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Smith v. Wilson
28 So. 2d 182 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Birmingham Clay Products Co. v. White
145 So. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)