Carothers v. McNabb
This text of 113 So. 298 (Carothers v. McNabb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint in this case clearly appears upon its face to he filed under the Workmen’s Compensation -Act (Acts 1919, p. 206), and the proceedings and judgment are governed by the rules of law and practice applicable to such cases.
The judgment of the trial court can be reviewed here only by a writ of certiorari. The remedy by appeal, to which defendant has here resorted, is not available, and the appeal will be dismissed. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 206 Ala. 488, 90 So. 871; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carothers-v-mcnabb-ala-1927.