Carothers v. McNabb

113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1927
Docket6 Div. 863.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 113 So. 298 (Carothers v. McNabb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carothers v. McNabb, 113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170 (Ala. 1927).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The complaint in this case clearly appears upon its face to he filed under the Workmen’s Compensation -Act (Acts 1919, p. 206), and the proceedings and judgment are governed by the rules of law and practice applicable to such cases.

The judgment of the trial court can be reviewed here only by a writ of certiorari. The remedy by appeal, to which defendant has here resorted, is not available, and the appeal will be dismissed. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 206 Ala. 488, 90 So. 871; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faddis v. Woodward Iron Company
161 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Smith v. Wilson
28 So. 2d 182 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Birmingham Clay Products Co. v. White
145 So. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 298, 216 Ala. 366, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carothers-v-mcnabb-ala-1927.