Stauffer v. Trump

S.D. New York

Stauffer v. Trump

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 8, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-05698·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HOWARD RICHARD STAUFIER. SS

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 5698 (KMW) JUDGMENT DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 2, 2025, Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(), (11). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York July 8, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HOWARD RICHARD STAUFIER. SS

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 5698 (KMW) JUDGMENT DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 2, 2025, Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(), (11). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York July 8, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: DeputyClerk

Stauffer v. Trump, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Stauffer v. Trump (Stauffer v. Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related