State v. Young

176 S.W.3d 719, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1717, 2005 WL 3109054
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 946
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2005·No. No. ED 84867·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Young (Young) appeals his convictions and sentence for forcible rape, kidnapping, assault in the second degree, and assault in the third degree. Young contends the trial court erred when it (1) submitted the kidnapping charge to the jury; (2) denied his request to cross-examine the victim regarding a prior arrest; and (3) allowed the prosecution to file, at the close of the evidence, a substitute information that added an alternative charge of assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 176 S.W.3d 719, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1717, 2005 WL 3109054 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

176 S.W.3d 719 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.