State v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Young

161 S.W.3d 899, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 946894

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2005

DocketNo. ED 84714

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.W.3d 899 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Young, 161 S.W.3d 899, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 946894 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court on a jury verdict finding her guilty of felony stealing, in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced her to three years imprisonment, suspended the execution of the sentence, and placed her on five years probation.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court on a jury verdict finding her guilty of felony stealing, in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced her to three years imprisonment, suspended the execution of the sentence, and placed her on five years probation.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.W.3d 899, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 946894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-moctapp-2005.