State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Smith

214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2007 WL 446986

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2007

DocketED 87747

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 S.W.3d 351 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2007 WL 446986 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hattie Smith appeals her conviction on one count each of first degree assault and armed criminal action. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hattie Smith appeals her conviction on one count each of first degree assault and armed criminal action. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2007 WL 446986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack