State v. Young

161 S.W.3d 899, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 946894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 946
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2005·No. No. ED 84714·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court on a jury verdict finding her guilty of felony stealing, in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced her to three years imprisonment, suspended the execution of the sentence, and placed her on five years probation.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 161 S.W.3d 899, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2005 WL 946894 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

161 S.W.3d 899 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.