State v. Woods

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Woods

414 S.W.3d 51, 2013 WL 6093447, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1367

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 95 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 2013·No. No. ED 99017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shyrus Woods (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shyrus Woods (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Woods, 414 S.W.3d 51, 2013 WL 6093447, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1367 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

414 S.W.3d 51 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.