State v. Woods

340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2011 WL 1530256
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. ED 94333·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Daneisha Woods, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of committing violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections, in violation of section 217.385 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior, persistent, and dangerous offender, and sentenced de *304 fendant to five years imprisonment, to be served consecutively to the sentence she was then serving. No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Woods, 340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2011 WL 1530256 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

340 S.W.3d 303 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flenoid v. Tate
340 S.W.3d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)