Flenoid v. Tate

340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 500, 2011 WL 1530172
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. ED 94245·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Flenoid (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment of December 21, 2009, wherein the trial court quieted title to property located at 1118 Union Boulevard in the City of St. Louis. Appellant raises six points on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flenoid v. Tate, 340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 500, 2011 WL 1530172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

340 S.W.3d 303 (Flenoid v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Woods
340 S.W.3d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)