Flenoid v. Tate

Missouri Court of Appeals

Flenoid v. Tate

340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 500, 2011 WL 1530172

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2011

DocketED 94245

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 303 (Flenoid v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flenoid v. Tate, 340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 500, 2011 WL 1530172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Flenoid (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment of December 21, 2009, wherein the trial court quieted title to property located at 1118 Union Boulevard in the City of St. Louis. Appellant raises six points on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Flenoid (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment of December 21, 2009, wherein the trial court quieted title to property located at 1118 Union Boulevard in the City of St. Louis. Appellant raises six points on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 303, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 500, 2011 WL 1530172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flenoid-v-tate-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack