State v. Woods

438 S.W.3d 450, 2014 WL 3823759, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Woods. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 95
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 5, 2014·No. No. WD 76262·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

James Napoleon Woods appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of two counts of first-degree burglary in violation of section 569.160, one count of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, one count of second-degree robbery in violation of section 569.080, and two counts of first-degree elder abuse in violation of section 565.180, for which he was sentenced as a persistent felony offender to a total of 165 years in the Department of Corrections. Woods argues that the trial court erred in allowing the three victims to identify him in court because, he argues, their identifications were the result of impermissibly suggestive pretrial police practices rather than their independent recollections of the perpetrator. We disagree and affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Woods, 438 S.W.3d 450, 2014 WL 3823759, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

438 S.W.3d 450 (State v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.