State v. Wogenstahl

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wogenstahl

699 N.E.2d 520, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2479

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 14, 1998

Docket98- 1146

StatusPublished

This text of 699 N.E.2d 520 (State v. Wogenstahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wogenstahl, 699 N.E.2d 520, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2479 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-930222. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On September 9,1998, appellant filed a request for oral argument that is untimely pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2)(B). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a document,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s request for oral argument be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-930222. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On September 9,1998, appellant filed a request for oral argument that is untimely pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2)(B). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a document,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s request for oral argument be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 N.E.2d 520, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wogenstahl-ohio-1998.