State v. . Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Wilson

21 S.E. 692, 116 N.C. 979

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 692 (State v. . Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Wilson, 21 S.E. 692, 116 N.C. 979 (N.C. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Faieoloth, C. J.:

The defendant is indicted for obtaining goods under false pretences. He was convicted and he entered a motion to arrest the judgment, which w^as refused and he appealed.

The indictment fails to charge that the goods were obtained “feloniously” and is therefore fatally defective. This is so by reason of the Act of 1891, Ch. 205. State v. Bryan, 112 N. C., 848; State v. Caldwell, Ibid, 854, and authorities there cited.

Judgment Arrested,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faieoloth, C. J.:

The defendant is indicted for obtaining goods under false pretences. He was convicted and he entered a motion to arrest the judgment, which w^as refused and he appealed.

The indictment fails to charge that the goods were obtained “feloniously” and is therefore fatally defective. This is so by reason of the Act of 1891, Ch. 205. State v. Bryan, 112 N. C., 848; State v. Caldwell, Ibid, 854, and authorities there cited.

Judgment Arrested,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 S.E. 692, 116 N.C. 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-nc-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack