State v. . Wilson

21 S.E. 692, 116 N.C. 979
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Faieoloth, C. J.:

The defendant is indicted for obtaining goods under false pretences. He was convicted and he entered a motion to arrest the judgment, which w^as refused and he appealed.

The indictment fails to charge that the goods were obtained “feloniously” and is therefore fatally defective. This is so by reason of the Act of 1891, Ch. 205. State v. Bryan, 112 N. C., 848; State v. Caldwell, Ibid, 854, and authorities there cited.

Judgment Arrested,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Wilson, 21 S.E. 692, 116 N.C. 979 (N.C. 1895).

21 S.E. 692 (State v. . Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hammonds
85 S.E.2d 133 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. . Callett
191 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Wright v. United States
1907 OK 63 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)
State v. . Bunting
24 S.E. 118 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
State v. . Shaw
23 S.E. 246 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)