State v. . Shaw

23 S.E. 246, 117 N.C. 764
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 246 (State v. . Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Shaw, 23 S.E. 246, 117 N.C. 764 (N.C. 1895).

Opinion

Avery, J. :

Since all criminal offences punishable with death or imprisonment in a State prison were by statute (Laws 1891, Oh. 205) declared Monies, indictments wherein there has been a failure to use the word “feloniously” as characterizing the charge in the latter class of eases, have been declared fatally defective. State v. Wilson, 116 N. C., 979; State v. Skidmore, 109 N. C., 795.

Whatever force there might be in the suggestion of the Attorney General that Section 1189 of The Gode renders it unnecessary to embody, in the charge what it is not material to prove, if it had been made before the latter statute *766 had been so often construed, it is now our duty to adhere to our decisions.

There was no error in sustaining the motion in arrest and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Callett
191 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
State v. . Brinkley
132 S.E. 796 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
State v. . Holder
69 S.E. 66 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State v. . Harris
59 S.E. 115 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E. 246, 117 N.C. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shaw-nc-1895.