State v. . Bunting

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Bunting

24 S.E. 118, 118 N.C. 1200

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, *Page 763 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.

Reversed.

Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.

(1201)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, *Page 763 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.

Reversed.

Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.

(1201)

State v. . Bunting, 24 S.E. 118, 118 N.C. 1200 (N.C. 1896).

Pincite

24 S.E. 118 (State v. . Bunting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related