State v. . Bunting

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Bunting

24 S.E. 118, 118 N.C. 1200

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 118 (State v. . Bunting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Bunting, 24 S.E. 118, 118 N.C. 1200 (N.C. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, *Page 763 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.

Reversed.

Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.

(1201)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, *Page 763 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.

Reversed.

Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.

(1201)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 118, 118 N.C. 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bunting-nc-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack