State v. Willingham
86 Miss. 203
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
At the conclusion of the testimony on behalf of the state the court sustained a motion to exclude. Prom that ruling discharging the defendant the state prosecutes this appeal. No question of law is presented by this record, but a decision of the court merely passing upon the sufficiency of the proof to sustain a conviction. In such state of case there is no warrant of law for the taking of an appeal by the state, wherefore this appeal is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Willingham, 86 Miss. 203 (Mich. 1905).
86 Miss. 203 (State v. Willingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Insley
606 So. 2d 600 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Correro
94 So. 2d 911 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1957)
State v. Jackson
64 So. 2d 341 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
State v. Sisk
46 So. 2d 191 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
State v. Nall
22 N.W.2d 520 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Ashley
11 So. 2d 832 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
City of Pascagoula v. Delmas
128 So. 743 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
State v. Peck
271 P. 707 (Montana Supreme Court, 1928)
City of Pascagoula v. Cunningham
106 So. 886 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Bourdon
89 So. 769 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
State v. Adams
86 So. 337 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1920)
City of Jackson v. Harland
72 So. 850 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
State v. Brooks
59 So. 860 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1912)
State v. Moore
60 So. 731 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1912)
City of Gulfport v. Stratakos
43 So. 812 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)
State v. Ireland
42 So. 797 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)