State v. Ashley
This text of 11 So. 2d 832 (State v. Ashley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
An appeal does not lie on behalf of the state or a municipality under section 19, Code of 1930, from a judg *112 ment of acquittal based upon a directed verdict in favor of a defendant in a criminal case where the peremptory instruction in such case is granted because of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge made in the affidavit or indictment, even though the question involved on the ruling of the trial court may be a mixed one of law and fact. City of Pascagoula v. Delmas et al., 157 Miss. 619, 128 So. 743; State v. Bourdon, 126 Miss. 877, 89 So. 769; State v. Adams, 123 Miss. 514, 86 So. 337; State v. Willingham, 86 Miss. 203, 38 So. 334; State v. Brooks, 102 Miss. 661, 59 So. 860; City of Jackson v. Harland, 112 Miss. 41, 72 So. 850; City of Pascagoula v. Cunningham, 141 Miss. 604, 106 So. 886.
It is therefore conceded by the Attorney-General that the motion of appellee to dismiss this appeal should be sustained. It is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 So. 2d 832, 194 Miss. 110, 1943 Miss. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ashley-miss-1943.