City of Jackson v. Harland

72 So. 850, 112 Miss. 41
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause was submitted to the judge below without a jury, upon an agreed statement of • facts, who, after finding that the evidence “did not show the offense charged in the affidavit,” discharged appellant.

This record does not present a question of law within the meaning of paragraph 2, section 40, Code 1906, and the right of the city to appeal is governed by State v. Willingham, 86 Miss. 203, 38 So. 334, and State v. Brooks, 102 Miss. 661, 59 So. 860, from which it follows that the appeal must be, and is, dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Jackson v. Harland, 72 So. 850, 112 Miss. 41 (Mich. 1916).

72 So. 850 (City of Jackson v. Harland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Insley
606 So. 2d 600 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Correro
94 So. 2d 911 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1957)
State v. Jackson
64 So. 2d 341 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
State v. Nall
22 N.W.2d 520 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Ashley
11 So. 2d 832 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
City of Pascagoula v. Delmas
128 So. 743 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
City of Pascagoula v. Cunningham
106 So. 886 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Bourdon
89 So. 769 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
State v. Adams
86 So. 337 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1920)