State v. Williams

327 S.W.3d 636, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1773, 2010 WL 5287383
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 2010·No. WD 71450·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John Williams appeals a judgment following a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree assault and armed criminal action. On appeal, Williams claims that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting Jody Nowels to testify as a late endorsed witness for the State because the defense was unfairly surprised by Now-els’s testimony. Williams also claims that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing Officer David Lanigan to testify that the statements made to him by four children .helped him to identify suspects, including Williams, because this testimony constituted inadmissible testimonial hearsay, which violated Williams’s rights under the Confrontation Clause. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b). •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 327 S.W.3d 636, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1773, 2010 WL 5287383 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

327 S.W.3d 636 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. State
327 S.W.3d 636 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)